Last week
D'Arcy Lussier decided - in an attempt to stand out among the
various
proposed DevTeach 2007 speakers - to stop talking about .NET
and focus on
erotic book covers instead. At least that was how I read
the first image featured in
"If Book Publishers Were Smart, Part Two",
because on viewing the right half of his "Wrox" book mockup, I became
powerfully aroused. This despite my being *firmly* heterosexual!! Truly I have never been so confused.
Now, D'Arcy's post was a controversial one for many reasons, not the
least of which that he randomly selected three developers for the
covers of these books, two of which just ended up there to fill space
while he paraded the third around shamelessly as a sex object despite
D'Arcy being married. As the sex object in question, I want you all to know
that
I was not offended. After all, nowhere is it more true than in the software industry that
appearance == credibility.
This seems to be what fueled
Scott Miller's
comment stating that on
average,
Wrox features nothing but the homeliest of homely on their book
covers and thus he felt no inclination to believe anything their authors said.
Jeff Julian, author of the Sharepoint Wrox book,
threw out his heart-shaped
Scott Miller locket in protest. However, was Scott really
that wrong? Do *you* trust anyone who would wear a Microsoft polo
shirt to a photo shoot? Hell, do you trust anyone who wears a
Microsoft polo shirt
in public? I think not.
It's plainly obvious to me that if Wrox wants to achieve any sort of technical respect in our industry, they need
way more sex appeal on their
book covers. What you want here is technical competency mixed with oozing machismo. D'Arcy's "Wrox" book cover is on the
right track; it definitely will draw in the coveted female developer
demographic while still having
Donald Belcham there to provide some shred of
technical credibility for the astoundingly few software professionals who actually
buy books for the...*snicker*...
content. While a pair programming book
featuring Donald and I teaming up would no doubt be the all-time best
seller of Wrox's publishing history, there are still three major
problems with it preventing it from outselling every other technical
book
combined.
-
the cover implies that Donald and I are a couple, whether it be the
strange positioning that looks like I am giving him the eye, or the
cover copy that states all of our pair programming is done in bed.
This is problematic not simply because both Donald and I are totally
hetero (and I am married!), but also because you need your audience to
think that they still have a chance at getting with us in order to guarantee sales.
-
The cover copy does nothing to point out why Donald and I are credible software developers, in fact the most credible in North American history.
-
As Keith Rull pointed out in (once again) D'Arcy's comments, this cover is far more likely to sell
with an "action" shot of me rather than my intentionally hilarious blog
photograph.
As I am both a super-genius and an incredible graphic designer, I have
taken the liberty of refactoring D'Arcy's original concept into
something that solves all three of these problems at once:
artist's conception
Wrox, if you are reading, I just gave you a
license to print money. Feel free to contact me to start a new
golden age of publishing!